With just five months remaining until the 2026 FIFA World Cup, a political controversy has already overshadowed the excitement surrounding the tournament set to be hosted jointly by the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The debate is not about football itself but rather revolves around recent actions and statements by U.S. President Donald Trump, which have prompted renewed calls for a potential boycott of the event.
Political figures in both England and Scotland have publicly suggested that their national teams reconsider participation in the World Cup. Senior British leaders have criticised Trump’s ambitions regarding Greenland and described some of his international conduct as crossing moral boundaries. They argue that under such circumstances, participating in a global sporting event hosted by the U.S. may not be appropriate. However, it is important to note that neither football authorities nor national federations have issued any official decisions regarding a boycott.
The 2026 World Cup will follow a tripartite hosting format, with both England and Scotland placed in competitive groups:
| National Team | Group | Opponents | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| England | D | Croatia, Ghana, Panama | 3 |
| Scotland | C | Brazil, Morocco, Haiti | 3 |
Amid escalating political pressure, some British Members of Parliament have stated that national teams must align their sporting commitments with the country’s broader political and ethical stance. The boycott debate primarily stems from Trump’s political activities, particularly his aggressive proposals regarding Greenland and threatening remarks towards European nations. Opponents argue that creating a politically charged environment in front of international players and spectators undermines the spirit and joy of the sport.
Support among general football fans for such a boycott remains uncertain. Some Scottish teams have expressed caution, affirming their support for the main event while remaining sensitive to the broader political debate.
The official schedule for the 2026 tournament was announced last December, and participating teams, including England and Scotland, have already begun preparations. FIFA and other relevant authorities have not provided any formal responses to these boycott discussions.
Football and politics have long been intertwined, but the unfolding situation ahead of the 2026 World Cup underscores how geopolitical tensions can influence major sporting events. Analysts suggest that while political accountability is important, the global sporting community must balance ethical considerations with the integrity and joy of the game.